Discipline-based education research, or DBER, has received a lot of attention lately. In 2012, the National Research Council published a report on DBER. The report suggests that DBER is both broadly focused on a wide array of sciences (“physics, biological sciences, geosciences, and chemistry”) and narrowly focused on undergraduate settings. Other disciplines, although not discussed in detail, are acknowledged – this is good since education research within math and engineering has a long history in undergraduate settings. Overall, I think the report suggests that DBER is: 1) focused on undergraduate teaching and learning; 2) grounded in deep understanding of natural sciences; and 3) grounded in the science of teaching and learning.
I suggest that DBER is both more and less than the work described in the report. More – DBER scholars already investigate learning in settings far afield from colleges and universities. Less – DBER scholars still struggle to build from pre-existing research paradigms or build new valid and reliable research theories/approaches.
This may sound silly, but I really do love the definition of “education” offered up at dictionary.com: “the act or process of imparting or acquiring general knowledge, developing the powers of reasoning and judgment, and generally of preparing oneself or others intellectually for mature life.” This definition encompasses the classroom, but does not require it, and in fact recognizes that learning occurs as a normal part of maturation and simply living. I would argue that limiting DBER to undergraduate settings fractures a community of scholars. Under this model, researchers of learning in undergraduate science are embraced by DBER scholars. In fact, DBER communities often include only those scholars who study undergraduate science learning within Colleges of Science. Other researchers of learning in higher education coalesce around higher education groups, such as the Association for the Study of Higher Education. Those people who study science learning in K-12 settings will find an intellectual home among traditional science education scholars housed in Colleges of Education (see NARST, for example), other communities embrace scholars studying museum learning (ASTC), or learning in parks (VSA), or even the scientific literacy of the general public (a journal example). Each of these communities then works mostly in isolation from each other – it would be far better to build a larger community that embraces each of these sub-fields. The very similar research questions and methodologies suggest that these groups might be better off working together, recognizing the commonalities of scholarship in these different fields rather than re-inventing the wheel. This working together would naturally require building a common set of theories, research methods, and analytical techniques that all communities can value.
I leave with some questions: What does it mean for a field to have emerged as a new research discipline? Has DBER actually emerged as geophysics once did, or is DBER still, much like a butterfly in its crysalis, struggling through a metamorphosis?
Our latest paper stemming from a collaboration with TERC is in press with the Journal of Geoscience Education:
Ellins, K.K., Shapiro-Ledley, T., Haddad, N., McNeal, K., Gold, A., Lynds, S., and Libarkin, J., in press, EarthLabs: Supporting teacher professional development to facilitate effective teaching of climate science: Journal of Geoscience Education.
Learn more about EarthLabs through the EarthLabs site!
A new chapter on assessment has been published in an American Geophysical Union book focusing on the anthropocene.
Libarkin, J.C., 2014, Evaluation and Assessment of Civic Understanding of Planet Earth. In G. Roehrig, D. Dalbotten, & P. Hamilton (Eds.) Future Earth: Advancing Civic Understanding of the Anthropocene, p. 41-52.
We are pleased to announce that two chapters have been published in a new book on geoscience education published by Springer.
Libarkin, J.C., 2014, The role of scholarly publishing in geocognition and discipline-based geoscience education research. In V. Tong (Ed.) Geoscience Research and Education: Teaching at Universities, p. 69-76.
Libarkin, J.C., Jardeleza, S.E., McElhinny, T., 2014, The role of concept inventories in course assessment. In V. Tong (Ed.) Geoscience Research and Education: Teaching at Universities, p. 275-297.
We are pleased to announce that our publication is finally out in Science & Education.
McElhinny, T.L., Dougherty, M.J., Bowling, B.V., and Libarkin, J.C., 2014, Genetics curriculum and assessment: The status of instruction for bioscience majors in the United States: Science & Education, v. 23 (2), p. 445-464. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11191-012-9566-1
Dr. Libarkin has co-authored a chapter on EARTH SYSTEMS SCIENCE EDUCATION with Nir Orion for the Handbook of Research on Science Education, Volume II. This chapter provides a new look at latest developments in Earth Systems Science education and is a companion to the chapter co-authored by Nir Orion in 2007. Learn more about the book here: http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415629553/
I wanted to remind everyone how to subscribe to the community email listserv for people interested in Geoscience Education Research and Geocognition Research. Here’s how to subscribe:
To subscribe to this list send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org with the following text in the first line of the body of the message:
SUBSCRIBE GEOED-RESEARCH FirstName LastName
Example: SUBSCRIBE GEOED-RESEARCH John Smith
GRL personnel have again made some important achievements. I am excited to report that:
Undergraduate GREG RUETENIK did an amazing job on his poster at UURAF. His poster was entitled “APPLICATION OF SPATIAL ANALYSIS TOOLS TO PROJECTION OF EYE TRACKING DATA”. This work was funded by an MSU Undergraduate Research Support Scholarship; he is working on a paper, coming soon!
Graduate student NICOLE LADUE received a Geological Society of America Student Research grant for her project “THE INFLUENCE OF SPATIAL ABILITY ON GEOLOGIC PROBLEM SOLVING.” This award will allow Nicole to extend her dissertation research into the role of spatial ability on high school student Earth Science performance.
Graduate students NICOLE LADUE and CHRISTY STEFFKE have received Dissertation Continuation Fellowships from the College of Natural Science. This follows on the heels of ROBERT DROST and SHELDON TURNER receiving ESPP summer fellowships.
Graduate student ROBERT DROST was recently interviewed for the State News: http://www.statenews.com/index.php/article/2012/04/early_spring_conditions_spark_tornado_activity_throughout_state. Look for him in another State News article soon. Tornado question? Ask Bob.
Graduate student SHELDON TURNER was featured in the State News: http://www.statenews.com/index.php/article/2012/04/msu039s_third_annual_science_university_event_starts_friday.
Several graduate students in the GRL were recently recognized for their exceptional efforts in research through receipt of summer funding fellowships, research and travel grants, and national awards.
ROBERT DROST and SHELDON TURNER both received Environmental Science and Policy Graduate Student Summer Research Funding grants from Michigan State University. These grants provide funding for living expenses and research or travel expenses. Bob will spend the summer investigating the efficacy of tornado warnings, while Sheldon will be completing his dissertation research on environmental decision-making.
All four GRL graduate students, ROBERT DROST, NICOLE LADUE, CHRISTY STEFFKE, and SHELDON TURNER received Spring travel grants from the Department of Geological Sciences at Michigan State University. These funds will help students travel to national conferences to present their research findings, or lead workshops on cutting-edge approaches in data collection.
SHELDON TURNER received an award in the 2012 AAAS Student Poster Competition. His entry, The Effectiveness of Visualizations in Communicating Natural Resource Issues, was the winning poster in the Science in Society category. Look for his name in a SCIENCE magazine coming soon!
ROBERT DROST was presented with an honorary membership to the Southwestern Michigan-American Meteorological Society/National Weather Association in appreciation for his invited presentation on tornado warnings in mid-March.
Way to go, lab!
A new paper, coauthored by GRL Director Julie Libarkin and colleague Gabe Ording, documents the impact of writing assignments on student learning. Three writing assignments generated significant change in student ability to write scientifically, although our results suggest that three is an insufficient number to generate complete development of scientific writing skills.
READ AT THE PUBLISHER’S WEBSITE: The Utility of Writing Assignments in Undergraduate Bioscience
The Utility of Writing Assignments in Undergraduate Bioscience
ABSTRACT. We tested the hypothesis that engagement in a few, brief writing assignments in a nonmajors science course can improve student ability to convey critical thought about science. A sample of three papers written by students (n = 30) was coded for presence and accuracy of elements related to scientific writing. Scores for different aspects of scientific writing were significantly correlated, suggesting that students recognized relationships between components of scientific thought. We found that students’ ability to write about science topics and state conclusions based on data improved over the course of three writing assignments, while the abilities to state a hypothesis and draw clear connections between human activities and environmental impacts did not improve. Three writing assignments generated significant change in student ability to write scientifically, although our results suggest that three is an insufficient number to generate complete development of scientific writing skills.